President Bush this week declared that he has the power to bypass four laws, including a prohibition against using federal funds to establish permanent US military bases in Iraq, that Congress passed as part of a new defense bill.
Inappropriately behaving as a unitary executive, President Bush is thumbing his nose at our representative government. If he does not wish to abide by a law, of course he has the right to veto the law. However, once he signs the legislation, according to our constitution, he must abide by it. To sign the law and then refuse to follow the law is not an option. No president is above the law. We all know this. Even so, George Bush has consistently made "signing" statements whereby he proclaims that he is signing a legislation but will not follow it completely. Is this dangerous to our democracy? Why do we put up with it? Can we stop it?
This past Monday, President Bush signed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008, which included a statute forbidding the Bush administration from spending taxpayer money "to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq."
But Bush quietly attached a signing statement to the law, asserting a unilateral right to disregard the ban on permanent bases in addition to three other measures in the bill. "Provisions of the act...could inhibit the president's ability to carry out his constitutional obligations...to protect national security," the signing statement read.
Check this out; here's what Bush actually said while signing the legislation...